Banned film’s director searches for M’sian identity

Banned film’s director searches for M’sian identity

Banned film's director searches for M'sian identity

Show Ying Xin | 3 March 2017
中文版

Lau Kek Huat

He was born in Sitiawan, Perak, the hometown of the last Malayan Communist Party (MCP) secretary-general, Chin Peng. During festivals, his family members will light up candles and burn incenses in front of a portrait of his grandfather. However, the story of his grandfather was never told.

The grandfather was a MCP member. One day, the family heard three gunshots, they knew that he had been killed by the British forces. From then on, his father has no memories of his communist father.

Lau Kek Huat, 38, graduated from National Taiwan University of Arts, majoring in motion pictures. His debut feature documentary “Absent Without Leave” initially looks for the connection between his grandfather, father and himself, but eventually digs out the forgotten chapter of Malaysia’s official history.

Initially, he wanted to find out everything about his communist grandfather, but that journey went beyond his control. He managed to interview a number of ex-communist fighters and anti-Japanese soldiers.

However, the documentary was banned from being screened in Malaysia, for “having elements which may be negative for national development”.

Undoubtedly, Lau was disappointed about the ban.

“I thought it could be shown in Malaysia, this is my promise to them (the former communists),” said Lau in an interview with Malaysiakini.

“I planned to invite them to the cinema, and they will receive applause from the audience – that on-site feeling would be different.”

He believes that his interviewees would like to know what contemporary Malaysians’ views toward them are.

Empathy for the fighters

The 83-minute documentary was made from historical materials and interview clips of 60 hours. Lau hopes that through this film, Malaysian audiences can feel empathy for those who joined the independent struggles during that historical period.

“I think it’s with neither overbearing nor servile attitude that we proceed to tell their stories. We need to feel their feelings – not heroically, also not tragically.”

What if his grandfather was not a communist member, but helping the Commonwealth armed forces to kill the communists? Lau will still tell such a story of his grandfather, he said.

“I hope we have more stories from both sides. It’s important for self-reflection.”

The film’s production house Hummingbird Pictures claims that the film’s intention was not to portray the communists in a heroic light.

“The history of the Malayan Communist Party is a scar in the collective memory of this country… without mutual understanding, there is no chance for us to recover.”

So, the production house decided to make the film available for free online – only for Malaysians – between Feb 28 and March 5.

Lau Kek Huat studied business at the National University of Singapore before he became a primary school teacher in the country. Later, he decided to further study film in Taiwan.

He was awarded the Best Short Film Award twice (2009 and 2013) as well as the Best Director Award (2009) by the Taiwan Golden Harvest Festival, and has directed a few acclaimed short films.

He was selected as candidate in Golden Horse Academy 2013, which was led by renowned Taiwanese director Hou Hsiao-hsien.

In an interview, he mentioned Hou’s masterpiece “A City of Sadness”, where in one scene at a dinner table, he felt the same repressive atmosphere which his family shares.

Lau has been estranged from his father since young. They didn’t even speak with each other for almost a decade after Lau moved to Taiwan.

It turned out that his “absent father” also has an absent father – the communist grandfather who died young.

So he brought back his video camera from Taiwan, seeking stories of absent fathers from his family members and relatives.

5-year journey

Beyond his expectations, the 5-year journey of searching family histories dug up a hidden, untold chapter of Malaysian history.

Lau eventually went to Southern Thailand, Hong Kong and China to interview a number of former communist members. Some of them were sent back to China in the 60s, some stayed in Southern Thailand “peace villages”, while some returned to Malaysia after 1989 Hatyai Peace Agreement.

During the revolutionary era, many of the fighters were not necessarily well-equipped with Marxist theory or ideas of communism, but they were directly dissatisfied with foreign invasion and all forms of oppression. So, they chose to fight against injustice in the method they believed was right.

Yet, Lau is reluctant to tell these people’s stories through a grand historical narrative, as it will easily fall into the battle of ideology. He wants to avoid judging them in our own terms.

“I don’t have any political position, and I don’t want to argue whether theirs were right or wrong… I don’t want to use ‘big history’ or any political position to apply to them.”

“They believed in something, sacrificed their youth or even life for it. They should have their dignity preserved.”

“Human dignity can’t be violated… what I want to depict is the dignity of these seemingly small characters (under big history).”

‘Not a historian’

Many of these interviewees are already over 80 or 90 years old, but they still believe what they sacrificed will pay off – a change for a better world.

“I am not a historian, thus I am not rewriting history. Filming is about telling stories of the past, about how the past influences us.”

“Or, it is about what people will benefit from the past, when they understand history through films.”

Intentionally, “Absent Without Leave” did not interview any leaders of the struggles, but those untold characters with “flesh and blood”.

Some interviewees also expressed their curiosity to Lau, on why he doesn’t tell the stories of their party or leaders – why small characters like them?

“They have been burdened with too much pressure, the suffering was so big that they even didn’t think of themselves as a human being (but only subordinated to a party).”

“We also forgot that they are humans, we tend to use all kinds of labels to judge them. But we forgot that they are also humans, they participated (in communist struggles) just for simple reasons.”

Lau confessed that he knew little of communist history before shooting this film. In school, textbooks described the communists as terrorists; in society, such “sensitive” topics are not openly discussed; while in the family, many do not wish to recall the painful memories.

As a filmmaker, he challenges himself to touch upon taboos or things that he fears, such as the communist history and the relationship between father and son.

He browsed through related books on Malayan communists, including ex-members’ memoirs and essays written by researchers. He also spent quite a lot of money on getting historical film archives, only to allow audiences to really feel the atmosphere of that era.

Search for M’sian identity

Like many who grew up from Chinese-educated background, Lau’s Malaysian identity has always been obscured by racial politics. For him, this film allows him to return to the homeland.

In the last scene of the film, Lau accompanied his father back to Sitiawan to look for the ancestral house where his father was born, and possibly where his grandfather was killed.

However, they couldn’t find the exact location as the place is now surrounded by oil palm plantation.

“I don’t know where it (old house) is now,” his father said.

In the film, Lau’s aunt revealed that whenever his grandfather came back from the jungle, he would bring her and Lau’s father to shower – something that Lau’s father has no memories of.

“He (father) thought he has no father, but (after watching this clip)his expression seems to tell you that he found the bond connecting himself and his father,” Lau said.

“Only when people find the connection, then they would know they truly live in this place.”

“I, too, have been trying to find the connection. Or else, you have no ties with your homeland.”

Facts concerning Mat Rempits and Mat Cyclists

Facts concerning Mat Rempits and Mat Cyclists

Facts concerning Mat Rempits & Mat Cyclists

James Nayagam | 2 March 2017

In 2010 the Suriana Welfare Society Malaysia did a survey on Mat Rempits and realised the factors that gave rise to the possible causes of the situation whereby teenagers are involved in group activities outside their home.

They gather in groups late into the night and get involved in daring and dangerous forms of activity and with disregard to law and life.

In all cases of persons interviewed, the teenagers came from low-cost housing areas. They lived in cramped conditions with limited space. As such the teenagers gather outside their flats to meet their friends and have their activities. In fact, 80 percent of their parents interviewed did not know where or what their child was doing or with whom they were with.

Most teens were left to themselves and can be seen enjoying their freedom riding motorcycles without helmets or motorcycle licence, the youngest being 13 years of age. There was no parent monitoring.

We measured their self-esteem. Before they joined the group, the level of self-esteem was as low as 16 but this level soars up high to a level of 25 after they join the group. This indicates that as individuals they could be experiencing neglect and low-self esteem, but as a group, they have a sense of belonging and unity to the point they can ride their bikes fast and dangerously – death-defying and challenging the police on duty.

At the end of the race, they get a prize of RM5,000 and the other challenger’s motorcycle.

Most had difficulty coping with education. Often they were poor performers in schools and preferred to play truant. There was no motivation for the teenagers to do better in school and found no link between education in relation to their future. In fact, the teenagers found it a strain to attend schools.

Quite a number of them came from dysfunctional families. The mothers or fathers were divorced and remarried. The new ‘father’ or ‘mother’ refused to accept them as their own children. The teens also included those whose parents were single parents, who found it a challenge to manage their teenage child.

A number of them interviewed were slow learners or had learning disabilities. The children were never assessed as to their level of disability. The children very innocently got themselves involved in the wrong company of friends.

As such we need to address these contributing factors within our community so as to address the situation, rather than pointing fingers at persons and blaming everyone else for the problem. We need to take stock of the issues and work together to seek an effective solution.


James Nayagam is the chairperson of Suriana Welfare Society Malaysia.

More on VOX KINI

Should sex offenders be monitored?

Issues when fighting child sexual abuse

Are parents responsible for child abuse?

Should sex offenders be monitored?

Should sex offenders be monitored?

Should sex offenders be monitored?

James Nayagam | 2 March 2017

The question before us is – should a sex offender convicted and who had served his sentence overseas be monitored upon return to Malaysia? This question has received mixed responses.

Some felt that he has paid for his crime and that he is a free man. Others felt that taking into account the nature of the offence committed, he should be monitored.

To help us understand the situation, we must ask ourselves as to whether the person is a threat to society. To consider this question we must consider the nature of the offence committed. In this case, it was rape and sexual abuse and the victims being young girls. In fact, it was reported that in one case that he could have sexually abused over 1,000 women. Therefore sexual offences are not to be equated with any other forms of crime. For one, it has to do with causing bodily harm.

We must understand that sex offences/paedophilia is a sickness of the mind and not any ordinary crime. So even after a person has served his sentence, it does not mean he is free of his mental health condition. Therefore, like any form of a contagious disease, preventive measures must be taken to ensure that such a form of crime is contained. This can be done by monitoring the convicted offender.

The monitoring does in fact act as a follow-up for the person to live a normal life and to control his craving to commit a sexual crime. The offence-specific treatment that research has shown to be most effective holds offenders accountable. It is based on the notion that if an offender can be taught to manage successfully his propensity to sexually abuse, he becomes less of a risk to past and potential victims.

Sex offenders must be monitored intensively during community supervision in order to evaluate their level of commitment to and compliance with all imposed special conditions. This supervision typically should include:

  • Ensuring that the offender is actively engaged in and consistently attending an approved community-based treatment programme;
  • Verifying the suitability of the offender’s residence and place of employment;
  • Monitoring the offender’s activities by conducting frequent, unannounced field visits at the offender’s home, at his place of employment, and during his leisure time (eg, is he engaging in inappropriate, high-risk behavior such as collecting items that depict or are attractive to children?); and
  • Helping the offender to develop a community support system – including friends, family members, and employers who are aware of the offender’s criminal history, are supportive of the community supervision plan, and can recognise the sex offender’s risk factors.
    As such any convicted sex offender regardless if they are convicted in the country or overseas must be monitored for the benefit of himself and the possible future victims.

 


James Nayagam is the chairperson of Suriana Welfare Society Malaysia.

More on VOX KINI

Issues when fighting child sexual abuse

Are parents responsible for child abuse?

Truly “The Sickest Mannequin Challenge” in Malaysia

Issues when fighting child sexual abuse

Issues when fighting child sexual abuse

Issues when fighting child sexual abuse

James Nayagam | 2 March 2017

Though the phrase ‘Fight Child Sexual Abuse’ sounds positive, yet one must realise the realities and challenges surrounding the effort. Otherwise, we may have the thought but meaningless and ineffective strategies to deal with the issues.

I am writing this as a child’s rights activist for over 35 years, having dealt with the issues relating to child sexual abuse. I have realised that whilst there may be good ideas and proposals, yet the issues have been lacked commitment, implementation, follow-up and change in our present system.

One must bear in mind that in Malaysia it takes about more than five years before a case of child sexual abuse is reported. During which time young girls are subjected to severe forms of sexual abuse and remain silent, unable to tell anyone about the abuse. Despite having education programmes in schools and other forms of services, yet in terms of effectiveness, nothing much has changed.

Suriana Welfare Society did a survey of the issues that affect child sexual abuse. When dealing with the issue of rape, we realise that a child had to face much trauma due to lengthy court proceedings, coupled with postponements that could go on for years before the court reaches a decision. By which time the child has forgotten the details of the rape.

Yet during this period, it’s the child who loses her freedom in that she is kept in a protection centre and the offender is still on the loose.

In some cases, the rapist may be allowed to marry the victim. Then again what choice has she when prematurely she loses her childhood and becomes a wife of an adult who raped her. Society seems to be ignorant to as whether she is ready for child-bearing and parenthood, and disregards the psychological damage that may impact her permanently.

In some states in Malaysia, incidences of incest appear prevalent but due to the standard of proof required, the cases are never reported and the situation continues to be a topic of discussion at every child-related seminar.

Richard Huckle’s case is an example of the weakness in our legal system. It was reported that he had sexually abused over 200 young children, the youngest being a six-month-old baby. Although could have been charged in Malaysia, but as to whether he would have been convicted is uncertain as there are no laws to punish effectively a paedophile on charges of with child pornography.

It simply shows that our system is outdated and change may take some time from the commencement of drafting new laws to discussions and to the implementation. One example being the Child Act, where it has taken almost 10 years for the amendments to be brought to Parliament.

Reservations over Sex Offenders Register

After the amendments to the Child Act, yet there is much debate over the Sex Offenders Register. Various agencies have declared their reservations over the use of the register. Some of the reasons being that there is already an existing police record of offenders and that such a register is a breach of one’s privacy.

Yet even with the register, only a few offenders are registered as in many cases, especially offences relating to fondling, pornography and other forms of sexual abuse are never brought to court due to weak investigation into the cases, and thus the prosecution is unable to proceed with the cases to be heard in court.

Experts tell me that an estimated 750,000 of cases of child abuse occur each year in Malaysia and a ratio that out of every 10 children, one is a victim of abuse. I cannot imagine the statistics for sexual abuse which takes place behind walls and in most cases, 80 percent of the abusers are known to the child.

With the issues mentioned above I would like to see one day an effective system to deal with the issue of child sexual abuse. Not just to spicy juicy talk and proposals but real commitment, action, implementation and follow-up.

We speak on behalf of babies, young children and young girls who at this very moment are being abused and their cries for help go unheard and justice is not seen done.


James Nayagam is the chairperson of Suriana Welfare Society Malaysia.

More on VOX KINI

Are parents responsible for child abuse?

Truly “The Sickest Mannequin Challenge” in Malaysia

Common causes of domestic violence

Pink Dot 2016: Our Heroes – AJ & Honey Bee

Pink Dot 2016: Our Heroes – AJ & Honey Bee

Pink Dot 2016: Our Heroes – AJ & Honey Bee

AJ thought telling his mother he was gay was difficult, until he had to break the news of something even more life-changing.

Director: He Shuming
Executive Producer: Boo Junfeng
Production Company: Two Chiefs Films
Producers: Su-Mae Khoo, Brian McDairmant
Director of Photography: Brian McDairmant
Sound: Su-Mae Khoo
Editor: Brian McDairmant

Colour Grading at Infinite Frameworks
Audiopost and Music at The Gunnery

With Thanks to:
Miak Siew

Make everyday a #zerodiscrimination day!